NICOLA Sturgeon has hit back at a Labour peer who raised concerns her regular coronavirus briefings breach impartiality rules.
George Foulkes said Ofcom should insist on BBC Scotland changing the TV coverage to remove the First Minister.
He argued public health officials should present the Covid facts rather than politicians, who could use the Scottish Parliament for political statements.
Lord Foulkes said if the live briefings continued into next year’s Holyrood election campaign it would be an “outrageous breach of the impartiality rules which Ofcom has a responsibility to uphold”.
Asked about his comments during her latest update, Ms Sturgeon said she has "a really important responsibility as First Minister to communicate public health information to the public".
She added: "Whether they are broadcast live is not a matter for me, that's a matter for broadcasters and I'm not going to comment at the moment on that.
"I think the only thing I'd say is George Foulkes has never wanted these briefings to happen, which I think is regrettable because it suggests that political considerations are more important than the vital imperative of communicating directly to the public in a public health emergency.
"But that's for him to answer for, not for me."
Opposition politicians have repeatedly raised concerns over Ms Sturgeon's coronavirus briefings.
In August, Labour demanded an urgent meeting with the head of BBC Scotland over what it claimed were “increasingly political” briefings on the outbreak.
The Scottish Tories have accused Ms Sturgeon of using the briefings “to promote SNP policy and stir up resentment”.
In a letter sent to Ofcom on Saturday, Lord Foulkes revealed he had already expressed his concerns in a meeting with new BBC Director-General Tim Davie last month.
He said he told Mr Davie the First Minister was speaking directly to the people of Scotland “ostensibly” as a Covid update, but including “topics of a political nature, sometimes critical of the UK Government, with no proper right of reply to the other parties”.
Lord Foulkes told Ofcom: “As you will appreciate, I am not a supporter of the current UK Government, but I am a supporter of adherence to the rules of political impartiality at both a UK and Scottish level.”
He said Mr Davie then arranged for him and Edinburgh MP Ian Murray to meet the new BBC Scotland director Steve Carson.
He said: “We expressed our concerns that the rules on political impartiality continue to be flouted.
“It was clear that BBC Scotland broadcast the briefings whenever asked to by the Scottish Government. They could not give us any instance when they had refused to do so.”
Lord Foulkes said BBC Scotland refused to cover the event as if it were a news conference, and so confine it to news bulletins.
He said: “They would not pursue this, I believe because they feel intimidated by the overbearing attitude of the Scottish Government.
“Can I therefore ask Ofcom to now investigate this with a view to insisting that BBC Scotland alter the format of the coverage of the epidemic to conform with the rules.
“If there is a need for a political statement it should be done in the Scottish Parliament, where the Opposition parties have the opportunity to ask questions and comment.
“I cannot stress enough how widespread the concern is on this and how urgent action is needed.”
The Scottish Government said: “The regular live media briefings by the First Minister are used to disseminate the latest public health guidance on coronavirus, as well as important information about services and support for people and the economy.
"They also provide an opportunity for scrutiny from the media with 10 to 20 members of the media participating every day.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel